The Manila Times

Top Stories

  Home  

  About Us  

  Contact Us 

  Subscribe     Advertise  
  Archives     Feedback  

  Register  

  Help  

  Top Stories

  Metro

  Business

  Regions

  Opinion

  World

  Life & Times

  Sports

 
 
 

Thursday, December 04, 2008

 

Defensor: Simple majority 
vote on impeachment

By Sammy Martin, Reporter
 
The fourth impeachment complaint against President Gloria Arroyo was trashed at the plenary during nominal voting that ended 12:47 a.m. of Wednesday. Voting against the complaint were 183 lawmakers and 21 for it. There were three abstentions.

After the voting, the chairman of the House Committee on Justice said that he wants the constitutional provision requiring one-third vote of members of the House of Representatives for an impeachment complaint to make it to the Senate be amended to simple majority vote.

Rep. Matias Defensor of Quezon City added that such amendment would make for a more stable government.

“Otherwise, you will have impeachment [complaints filed] every now and then and you see how dangerous it is” for the country, Defensor said during a chance interview.

Malacañang enjoined all Filipinos to “move on” after the fourth impeachment complaint was thrown out.

During his weekly press conference in Malacañang, Executive Secretary Eduardo Ermita said that the “destructive” process of impeachment was finally over.

“The President’s agenda has always been to attend to the immediate needs of our people . . . and look at the effects of this financial economic crisis and she has been sharing the things she has done in the Philippines with other leaders, so we can only say that we are glad that this impeachment case is over,” he added.

According to Defensor, the opposition has the habit of filing impeachment complaints every year because it thinks that the one-third vote is more reachable than the simple majority vote.

“It’s good that the President has many allies, otherwise we will have an impeachment complaint that will make it all the way to the Senate,” he said.

Pro- and anti-impeachment groups packed the gallery to listen to the lawmakers as they debated on the Committee Report 1551.

US Ambassador to the Philippines Kristie Kenney was also seen in the crowd, together with US officials.

When asked about her presence, Kenney said she was there for a visit to the House and won’t stay for the proceedings.

In his sponsorship speech for Committee Report 1551, Defensor noted that the complainants failed to prove grounds for impeachment that would merit a trial in the Senate for President Arroyo.

“It is but right, therefore, that if the one-third-vote of all members of the House of Representatives is not garnered, despite this liberal constitutional concession, those for impeachment must accept the result without rancor or misgivings,” Defensor added.

According to Rep. Elpidio Barzaga Jr. of Cavite, the impeachment proponents were given the opportunity to speak and advance their arguments.

The vice chairman of the House Committees on Revision of Laws, Constitutional Amendments and Local Government said that there was “no sufficient recital of facts, which would warrant the offense charged.”

As he cast his negative vote, House Minority Leader Ronaldo Zamora of San Juan City (Metro Manila) asked, “Is this [dismissal] the way to treat a serious impeachment complaint?”

Zamora, together with Representatives Rufus Rodriguez of Cagayan de Oro City, Roilo Golez of Parañaque City, Joel Villanueva and Cinchona Cruz-Gonzales of Cibac party-list, Mujiv Hataman of Anak Mindanao party-list, Justin Marc Chipeco of Laguna, Mar-Len Abigail Binay of Makati City, Maria Laarni Cayetano of Taguig City-Pateros, Benjamin Asilo of Manila and Darlene Antonino-Custodio of South Cotabato left the plenary hall after each registering a “No” vote. They said that they saw no reason to explain their vote.

“It is the administration allies who should explain to the people their vote, why they are killing the impeachment complaint. The people know our stand,” Custodio told reporters during another chance interview.

But endorsers of the complaint, mostly party-list lawmakers, remained in the hall to argue against the junking of the complaint.

Earlier, Rep. Satur Ocampo of Bayan Muna party-list, in interpellating Defensor, protested the rejection of the impeachment complaint.

Ocampo said the charge of human-rights violations against Mrs. Arroyo could not be labeled an old issue because there have been new cases added to the fourth impeachment complaint that were not in previous cases.

Rep. Teodoro Casino, also of Bayan Muna, said the Defensor committee adopted the “cut-and-paste” method in trashing the complaint, as the administration-dominated House of Representatives supposedly supposedly did with the three previous impeachment complaints against the President.

Pro-impeachment lawmakers needed at least 79 votes in the plenary or one-third of the House membership to reverse the ruling of the House justice committee last week and send the impeachment complaint to the Senate for trial.

Committee Report 1551 also contained the junking of three other impeachment complaints filed against Mrs. Arroyo by columnist Manuel Quezon 3rd and lawyers Oliver Lozano and Guillermo Sotto. The fourth complaint was filed by businessman Jose “Joey” de Venecia 3rd, son of former House Speaker Jose de Venecia Jr.
-- With Angelo S. Samonte

   

Phgifts

philflora.gif

Manila Times Friends

 
Sponsored Links
 

Back To Top

 
 
 

Severino O. Frayna Jr., Benjie Dela Rosa
Powered by: 
The Manila Times Web Admin.

  

Home | About Us | Contact | Subscribe | Advertise | Feedback | Archives | Help

Copyright (c) 2001 The Manila Times | Terms of Service
The Manila Times Publishing Corp. All rights reserved.

Hosted by: